Free Flowing Thoughts

As opposed to the expensive, stationary ones?

Notes

Dan Lyons misses some key points...

My thoughts while I was reading through this article:

  • The Time and WSJ apps are first-generation.  They both have a long road ahead of them, and the competition is going to force them to get better and provide even more value to their readers.  And they view their competition as any outfit who can generate content, not just the other media companies (they paid attention to the lesson of Amazon coming from nowhere and know it can happen here quite easily).
  • Yes, people do need to be able to share stuff (text/links/etc.). Again, I see these apps in the “Make it work” category (the next being “Make it good”, then “Make it great”).
  • I don’t think Apple is bullying developers in the slightest.  If you don’t want to play by their rules, go develop for Android, webOS, or Nokia’s platform. Developers are making money on these platforms, too.
  • The music business was a lot worse off then than the publishing business is now.  Publishing has a lot of options (perhaps too many options for them to parse, but that’s a good challenge to have, no?).  And, again, the competition isn’t going to stand still and give them time to catch their breath.

Notes

Daring Fireball: The iPad (plus comments from me)

A really excellent, detailed review of the iPad from a user’s point of view.  Just a couple of quick comments on this:

  • I totally agree with the iWork comments. I want to save documents somewhere in the cloud, be it iWork.com, on my iDisk, or elsewhere.  Or it would be nice to have a way to wirelessly sync with iWork on the Mac, but I think that’s too hard and clumsy to do.
  • In addition to Amazon’s larger collection of books, I can also share my e-Books with the Kindle reader on the Mac or on my iPhone, and use WhisperSync to remember my place when I’m device-hopping. To me, that makes the choice easy - I want it everywhere, not just on one device. (But iBooks IS a much nicer reading experience…)

In fact, the syncing story is the Achilles’ heel of the iPhone/iPad/iPod universe.  It was acceptable back in the day when these devices were new and DRM was king, but now it’s becoming a bit of an anachronism.

Palm had an inadequte-but-better solution with HotSync and Conduits: developers could write a program that plugged into the device synchronization to take application data and sync it with whatever they needed on the desktop (such as a database, or a 3rd party calendar, etc.).  It was cumbersome, and you had to build separate conduits for both the Mac and Windows, but with a little banging it usually worked.  Of course, the cloud is a better story - easier, no extra software to install (hopefully), more reliable (hopefully), easier to use on the fly (hopefully).

Notes

The Road Warrior and the iPad

I’ve been trying to figure out why I’m so excited about the iPad.  For years I’ve wanted a small, touch-interface computer that could connect me to the world wherever I go, and when I got my iPhone 3GS last July I felt like I was in heaven.  For a while.  The screen size limitation was the only thing, but I thought I could just live with that.

I’ve done mobile programming (mostly on Palm OS devices) for over a decade, in addition to programming for other platforms of various sizes as well as the web.  Most of my programming has been for enterprise apps, not the kind you typically find shrink-wrapped in a store.  The upside of this is that you get to hear a lot of what people want from their technology (not just from an application).

One of the biggest requests was for something that could replace their laptops.  This came not only from their bosses (who had to pay for all these computers) but also from the people themselves (who had to lug these things around).  I’d show them an enterprise messaging app on their device.  They’d coo and cluck about how cool it was, then invariable ask for one of two things:

  1. Can I do presentations from this?
  2. Can I do spreadsheets on this?

The answer was yes, but.  Yes, you could, and there were/are some really excellent apps that gave you most if not all of this capability (Documents to Go is my favorite). In the Palm world Margi had this great add-on that allowed you to tie a Palm handheld into a projector.  Companies like Landware and others had keyboards that could plug into these devices.  So yes.

But…

The screen was too small to do any real work.  A lot of these people were forty or older, and even with reading glasses it still meant eyestrain, and it was a small area to work on.

Additionally, memory was in short supply, which meant a lack of resources on the device.  Because of that, you couldn’t realistically assume you would have items to clip and put inside a slide or a spreadsheet.

And the processor was often slow.  Power is a big deal on these mobile devices, and the more powerful the processor, the more power it eats, so the bigger the battery, and the heavier the device.  The slower the processor, the slower the responsiveness (and I’m not even talking multitasking).

The simple solution was to have a computer that you use to do the heavy-lifting (spreadsheet/presentation creation).  This could work but it meant:

  • You have a computer someplace
  • You can easily get to that computer when you’re traveling
  • Syncing is foolproof between the computer and the handheld
  • You still needed to communicate with the office (email)

After trying this, most people realized that they still needed to have a laptop to support their handheld (since they were traveling), plus this dongle to hook up to it to sync and another to do presentations, plus a keyboard for the handheld.  They would be carrying more stuff AND THEY’D STILL HAVE THE LAPTOP.

No win.

Fast forward to recent times.  The iPhone/iPod Touch are a lot closer in providing this rich road warrior experience, but the screen is still too small to chuck a laptop entirely.

Enter the iPad.  I was very interested in this as a new category of a device, so I followed the January product introduction with mild interest.  I was intrigued by a platform that had a touch interface and a large screen.  I liked what Microsoft had done in the past, at an academic level, but it always seemed like either the hardware was inadequate, the software was too tied to the desktop metaphor, or both.  I’d seen enough of them at trade shows, but it never grabbed me, especially at the extra cost for these buggers.

Then Apple started to talk about iWork.  Keynote.  Numbers.  Pages.

Yes.  YEs. YES. YESSSS!!!!!!

They had hooked me.  The worm tasted sweet.  Reel me in,  Fishermen Schiller and Jobs!  As I flopped around on the shore of potential productivity I was fascinated by the ease and simplicity of how they did everything, of how bright and shiny it all looked, and the beauty of the outputs they demonstrated (and seeing the recent guided tour videos I’m even more impressed).

And I could even project my presentation RIGHT FROM THE iPAD!

To quite Scotty from “Star Trek”, “Starfleet canna be serious, Cap’n.”

Oh, yes.  Yes, they are.

The jury is out as to whether or not this will replace a laptop for these cases, or even if it will be adopted by them, but it has the best chance of meeting their needs.

That’s why I’m bullish on the iPad.  It has the potential to fit needs.  It’s not perfect, but it’s close.

(Note that you still have the Syncing issue, but if you do all your presentation work on the iPad it’s now just for backup.  I would love to see Apple or someone come up with a Carbonite-style backup utility for the iPad that worked over WiFi or 3G.)

Notes

In many ways, it’s the things that are not there that we are most proud of. For us, it is all about refining and refining until it seems like there’s nothing between the user and the content they are interacting with.

Jonathan Ive, to Stephen Fry, The iPad Launch: Can Steve Jobs Do It Again?

(So very true…)

Notes

A note on UPS and the iPad

If you’re like me, breathlessly awaiting your Saturday iPad shipment but living in a more out-of-the-way locale that normally doesn’t get get Saturday UPS deliveries, well, take a breath.

I just got off the phone with UPS, trying to discover if my iPad will come Saturday (yay) or Monday (boo).  The gist is that it will come Saturday.  Some points of interest:

  • If you want to check on your iPad delivery, make sure you have your tracking number handy and call UPS at 1-800-782-7892 (not their normal number, this one is focused on international deliveries).  When I called the normal number the rep on the phone didn’t know anything, and told me that UPS had no alternatives for ensuring Saturday delivery other than if it was a “critical express” package. Once he checked my tracking number and saw the package was coming from China he forwarded me to the number above.
  • The folks at UPS have had a LOT of calls about iPad deliveries.  The person I spoke to (Howard) told me that they have a special arrangement with Apple that guaranteed that these would be delivered on Saturday (specifically, he said that my delivery was included in the guarantee).  In fact, when I told him the delivery was for this Saturday he knew right away it was an iPad - surprise, surprise LOL!

Again, the number to call if you want to check is 1-800-782-7892.

(I hate to be a fanboy about this, but I do think this is going to be an exciting and interesting product.)

Filed under ipad ups

Notes

If I’d asked my customers what they wanted, they’d have said a faster horse.
Henry Ford

0 notes

Re: Palm's Troubles Are Bad News for Microsoft and Nokia (MSFT)

I think this is an interesting (but flawed) analysis of the smartphone market.  Palm is very skilled at not missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity.  They turned their back on their (sizeable) Palm OS development base and gambled that they could interest people with web development skills to make their device a success (but then proceeded to screw that up).

Don’t get me wrong - I wanted Palm to succeed, and I think WebOS did a lot of things right.  But given my past experiences with them I believed they wouldn’t succeed.  I wanted Palm to prove me wrong.

The flaw in this research?  I don’t know about Nokia, but I wouldn’t bet against Microsoft.  Unlike Palm, they have deep pockets, and they know how to engage their developer community.  But it is a rough road ahead, and if I was a smartphone device manufacturer I’d probably be working with Google on Android-based devices instead of Microsoft.